now this is my last post. I need to focus my energy on healing. Not trying to prove people wrong.
Fair enough but I really don't see that any arguments you have presented here regarding 'toxins' in vaccines are correct.
Let's go back to the formaldehyde which you have labelled as an unnecessary 'toxin' in vaccines.
Please take the time to point out to me what is 'wrong' with the following statements.
Formaldehyde is used in the process of making some vaccines. Vaccines need to be purified of extra viruses and bacteria or else they truly would be dangerous. After the contaminants have been killed by the formaldehyde, 99.9% of it is removed during the final steps of producing the vaccine.
We make formaldehyde in our body. A child has a blood volume of 5-9 mg of formaldehyde from natural processes in their blood at any given time. It would take about 10 -20 million doses of vaccines to cause a very slight increase of formaldehyde in the body.
As I said before, formaldehyde is found in many foods -- fruits, nuts for example. Do you eat the food that contains this dangerous 'toxin'.?
Also, formaldehyde has a half-life of about 1 minute, so it can't even accumulate in the body.
I am sure it could be argued that formaldehyde is a nasty toxin. And yes, it absolutely is in high concentrations. I remember doing a dissection of a rats brain that had been soaked in formaldehyde. It was nasty evil, eye burning smelly stuff. You can't say that a substance is dangerous at all concentrations which is what you seem to be saying. Because the minute amount of formaldehyde in vaccines is not the same as being exposed to much much higher concentrations.
Do people who believe formaldehyde is a toxin in vaccines eat apples and pears. If they do they have lost their argument. Same goes for Aluminum -- it's everywhere -- in food, in the air, in the water in much greater doses than vaccines, yet it's apparently 'toxic' in vaccines, but we are not poisoned by it via the air, water, food. I wish these people who believe that the 'toxins' in vaccines are harmful would learn some basic chemistry and actually read some scientific research.
And as for all the comments about the dangers of mercury. Thimerosal is not mercury in it's elemental form and really it's all a moot point now because it is only used in multi-dose flu vaccines.
Just like formaldehyde, thimerosal is a toxic compound at a certain concentration. The half-life of thimerosal is about 2.2 days. It is cleared out by the kidneys, it does not accumulate.
To reach a toxic dose of thimerosal in a child, you would have to inject them about 4 million times a day to make it even potentially toxic.
Big Pharma must love the people that had the thimerosal removed from most vaccines. Other than the flu vaccine, every single vaccine has to be in a single-use pre-filled syringe which has actually caused the cost of vaccines to rise and given them lots more profit. That could lead to some interesting conjecture about who really is in the pocket of Big Pharma (just joking).
Just because there are no studies to show that it has caused issues I can still believe that it's not good for us. And Mercury doesn't just go in and out without being absorbed. Regardless of the type of mercury. If that was the case why are people who do not have mercury fillings having mercury poisoning. Andrew Cutler is a knowledgeable man, just read his book. Also when we have genetic mutations that hinder our bodies detox process we cannot safely eliminate these toxic fillers. We also aren't just reciving one vaccine. We get multiple ones. Right from birth. Then we are to get booster every couple of years
Elemental mercury has nothing to do with vaccines. As I already said, the half-life of thimerosal is about 2.2 days. It is cleared out by the kidneys, it does not accumulate. There is no mercury in childhood vaccinations -- so they are not getting repeated doses of any form of mercury.
How can we trust what the government has to say when they purposfully put flouride in our water? I mean it has been classified as carcinogenic and a neurotoxin. Why is that in our water system? It has no benefit. Yes flouride is a part of nature, but the amounts we are subjected to consume on a daily basis if we drank tap water is far more than what we would get in nature. It has no purpose.
Again you are confusing high doses of something as compared to .7 - 1.0 parts per million. It has a purpose. I guess we should ask the government to stop purposefully trying to keep us from getting sick by purifying all the bacteria and parasites out of our water. How nasty of them to keep us all so confused by purposefully poisoning us and at the same time stopping us from getting nasty bacterial and parasitical infections.
Did you know that the government actually removes fluoride from the water in some communities because the concentrations of it are far above what they consider safe. There is always an envelope with all substance re: what is safe and what is not. The problem some make it an either/or issue.
I have problems with people with compromised immune systems getting vaccinations but it has nothing to do with things like formaldehyde or aluminum.
I have probably just wasted a few hours on this because I doubt you will change your mind about these things. Really, a little more research on these things might be helpful for you and a little knowledge of toxicology.
