I can see that both doctors are very well regarded, but does anyone know if there are significant difference in the approaches these two docs take? Is there any reason to see one over the other based on one's profile and symptoms, or based on any other reason? From what I can see two differences might be costs and wait list and the possibility of not being accepted as a patient with Peterson. But as far as medical approaches I don't know if they are similar and I'm not really familiar with treatments the specialists use so that doesn't help me in sorting things out. Thanks for any info.