alex3619
Senior Member
- Messages
- 13,810
- Location
- Logan, Queensland, Australia
Notice that this kind of pathology violates Koch's postulates. Neither EBV nor h. pylori alone is responsible.
Most of these are long term human pathogens (HIV is an exception). They co-evolved, with humans and other viable species as hosts. We are the environment they co-evolved in. As such it can be expected that they will have capacity to take advantage of other co-infections they have co-evolved with.
Occam's Razor is about simpler hypotheses having preferences. Its not a law, its a heuristic. Further, I think it was once said (Albert Einstein?) that explanations should be as simple as necessary, but no simpler. In other words, they must explain all the relevant data, and as new data is found that violates them then even more complex hypotheses should be adopted. Biological findings are not set in stone, and even long-standing findings should be considered changeable.
I think a lot of the argument for Occam's Razor arises in harder sciences like physics. Simpler equations are often preferred. Biology is messy. We are talking of systems of things interacting. Reductionism and critical rationalism, and heuristics like Occam's Razor, start to meet their limits here, and really fail when it comes to psychology or psychiatry.