Comprehensive independent analysis of PACE trial?

[energyoverload]

Hi,

does anyone know if anyone has done a comprehensive analysis of the PACE trial that goes into even more detail than George's one. You'll son see why, please this would really help finally put this nonsense to rest.

energy

 

[Esther12]

Anything comprehensive would be of unreadable length I'm afraid.

This is a summary designed to be easy to read and understand: http://evaluatingpace.phoenixrising.me/summary.html

A collections of summaries is available here: http://forums.phoenixrising.me/inde...ques-links-thread-no-discussion-please.14121/

Anything in particular you are looking for?

 

[alex3619]

Anything comprehensive would be of unreadable length I'm afraid.

While my book is looking like being much wider in focus than PACE, I have to concur. Just the introduction looks to blow out to 400 pages. That makes my book more a report than a book. It is my intention to release this for free, but perhaps write a condensed and more readable version which I might charge for, but that is far in the future. To cover things in detail, particularly when there are this many things wrong, is very hard to do simply and concisely.

Perhaps someone could write a rewiew based on current summaries and criticisms?

 

[Esther12]

Before setting about this writing marathon, it might be worth thinking 'Who is going to read a CFS book with a 400 page introduction!?'

I struggle to remain cogent and avoid repeating myself if I ever get above 15 pages.