P2P, or not P2P, that is the question
As the 16 January, 2015 deadline for responding to the controversial P2P draft report draws near, and in the interests of balance and representing the whole community, Phoenix Rising presents two differing views on how to react. Today, Clark Ellis flags up important content to...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Cochrane Reviews' newish feedback section - an example of it in action

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Dec 16, 2013.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    7,095
    Likes:
    7,079
    (Probably a minority interest at the moment but I thought I'd post it in case I forget and somebody else remembers)

    Some people will be familiar with Cochrane reviews. They do systematic reviews of medical literature that hold a lot of weight/have a lot of status.

    They have done three, that I know of, on CFS:

    Such reviews tend to get updated every so often as new evidence comes along. We're expecting a couple in the next year or two (the PACE Trial authors have referred to these upcoming publications).

    Anyway, I heard somewhere that the Cochrane system now has a feedback mechanism. This could be a useful way to highlight criticisms of reviews, problems and gaps in the literature, etc. Somebody may have a link on this (the feedback mechanism).

    Anyway, I've just come across an example of this in action.
    It's from the review "Helmets for preventing head and facial injuries" http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001855/pdf
    See pages 16-29.
     
    Bob, alex3619, SOC and 1 other person like this.
  2. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,556
    Likes:
    6,556
    I think that I already saw something like this in their CFS review(s), and a reference to PACE. I don't remember it being that interesting though.
     

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page