Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Sep 28, 2016.
Free full text:
Loading Tweet... https://twitter.com/statuses/781161571171110912
This kind of pressure is certainly a factor that needs to be considered in examining PACE (both scientifically and ethically). However, I don't understand why this article (of all things) is being appealed to for authoritative support. The phenomenon it discusses may be real and important, but it lacks even PACE's low standards of methodological rigor. And its author (from what I can tell) is a lot more of a flake than any of the prominent BPS people.
You can also try a Google Site Search
Separate names with a comma.