Review: 'Through the Shadowlands’ describes Julie Rehmeyer's ME/CFS Odyssey
I should note at the outset that this review is based on an audio version of the galleys and the epilogue from the finished work. Julie Rehmeyer sent me the final version as a PDF, but for some reason my text to voice software (Kurzweil) had issues with it. I understand that it is...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

Changes over time in US cardiology guidelines

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by MeSci, Jan 8, 2015.

  1. MeSci

    MeSci ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?

    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes:
    12,806
    Cornwall, UK
    I wonder what the figures are for other illnesses...?

    This is from May-June 2014 - hope I'm not duplicating.

    http://www.jwatch.org/na34765/2014/06/05/how-durable-are-strong-recommendations-made-practice

     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2015
    Simon likes this.
  2. MeSci

    MeSci ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?

    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes:
    12,806
    Cornwall, UK
    Sorry - I don't know why it's appeared in italics. Can't seem to change it.
     
  3. Sushi

    Sushi Senior Member Albuquerque

    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes:
    21,471
    Albuquerque
    Anything you quote appears in italics.

    Sushi
     
    MeSci likes this.
  4. MeSci

    MeSci ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?

    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes:
    12,806
    Cornwall, UK
    D'oh!

    I was finding it hard to read. I've enlarged the text - hope that's better.
     
    Sushi likes this.
  5. picante

    picante Senior Member

    Messages:
    763
    Likes:
    878
    Helena, MT USA
    Surely doctors are aware of this! This just makes me laugh -- I'm such a cynic.
     
  6. jimells

    jimells Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,997
    Likes:
    6,099
    northern Maine
    They just don't get it. "Consensus" is not scientific, and neither is "opinion"!

    I very much doubt it. They are too busy trying to see 20 patients an hour to do more than mindlessly follow the "guidelines".

    In spite of research showing little benefit and a huge list of serious adverse effects, they are still prescribing statins by the truckload. After taking statins for years, my 78-year-old mom was finally forced to stop after she developed a problem with having to pee huge amounts at night. A few weeks later her slowly-developing "dementia" was miraculously cured!

    Even for patients with previous stroke or coronary events, over 95% of patients who take statins for five years gained no benefit, while 10% were harmed by muscle damage. This happened to my next-door neighbor. After taking statins for some time, he couldn't lift a can of beer to his lips without pain. And for someone who drinks as much beer as my neighbor, this was a serious adverse effect, for sure!
     
    Little Bluestem, MeSci and picante like this.
  7. barbc56

    barbc56 Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,652
    Likes:
    5,006
    I'm also a cynic but find this a positive.

    As, the author says, new evidence means things need to change.

    This is how science works. I think having this published in JAMA, will help these findings translate to medical practice. Health insurance would also/hopefully, take these recommendations when approving cost of treatments treatments.:)

    At least in theory.

    BARB
     
    MeSci likes this.
  8. MeSci

    MeSci ME/CFS since 1995; activity level 6?

    Messages:
    7,968
    Likes:
    12,806
    Cornwall, UK
    If you get the email newsletter Physician's First Watch you will be struck by the number of long-accepted treatments, including surgical ones, that are eventually found to be ineffective.

    A recent one is renal denervation :eek: for a type of hypertension. It don't work.
     
    jimells likes this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page