Volunteer opportunity: Organizing Phoenix Rising articles
This section contains all the articles that have been published by Phoenix Rising over the years. As you will see if you browse here, some of the articles are outdated--either the research has been superseded or retracted or the article features an event or campaign that is now in...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

CDC's Updated CDC/CFS Website: 21 July 2010 - CYA Plan for their desperate cover-up!

Discussion in 'General ME/CFS News' started by muffin, Jul 24, 2010.

  1. SOC

    SOC Senior Member

    Agreed. If the CAA and IACFS/ME don't address this, how are we, as patients, supposed to fight it?

    It's still not clear to me how the CDC expects me (or my doctor) to distinguish between these two supposedly distinct conditions. To which "neurological and muscular signs" exactly are they referring?

    When I reviewed the case definition linked above, I noticed this. which I hadn't noticed before:
    [my bolding]

    So if we have CFS we have a psychiatric disorder, but if we report "numerous symptoms not strictly related to CFS", say oh, perhaps "neurological and muscular signs", then our doctors should investigate the possibility of psychiatric disorders? Sounds like a catch-22 to me.
  2. CBS

    CBS Senior Member


    Oh really... This is quite a bold statement that clearly "implies an understanding about the pathophysiology of CFS that is not fully supported in the medical literature." And what might the CDC suggest? Perhaps a course or two of CBT or GET?
  3. SOC

    SOC Senior Member

    I ask forgiveness for my brain fogginess upfront, because the answer to this may be obvious....

    "CFS patients cared for by PCPs have a better prognosis" than whom? Those in the care of specialty care centers?
  4. SOC

    SOC Senior Member

    << However, improvement is possible in any individual patient at any point in the course of the illness.>>

    Yes, quite bold since they couldn't even find a reference (even from Wessely) for this statement.
  5. leelaplay

    leelaplay member

    This might be directly related enough. Frances, ex DSM -IV chair, therefore a good person to quote against the shadow of Reeves, says that psych are over-diagnosing

    from medpage:
    There's a noteworthy column in Psychiatric Times, "Normality Is an Endangered Species: Psychiatric Fads and Overdiagnosis," by Allen Frances, MD. He was chair of the task force that worked on the Diagnostic & Statistical Manual -- DSM-IV -- one edition of the "bible of psychiatry." He is professor emeritus of psychiatry at Duke University School of Medicine.

    from Frances:
    and there are some interesting comments on the medpage blog
  6. taniaaust1

    taniaaust1 Senior Member

    Sth Australia
    I've known the CDCs stance on all this for many years. Its thou been impossible and very frustrating to get those with ME to actually listen about the game the CDC is playing with the ME patient community, they play games and successfully manage to mess with most peoples heads. This bothers me soo much as they take those who are struggling to think.. and do this!!

    CDC will never take responsibility for anything bad which happens to the ME patients for after all.. they WILL say it isnt their fault if someone has been incorrectly diagnosed with CFS rather than ME.

    (and i think England health system and government or whatever (wessely??) further help confuse the issue by making CFS into ME over in England. By doing that.. it makes those who do have actual ME in America.. think even more that they have CFS as after all those who have ME in England (by the england defination now) do often have CFS. Ive always wondered if it was purposely called ME in England and not CFS there.. to bury ME further.

    What is it about ME which makes governments (both America and England) want to bury the illness?????

    Ask how can two completely different illnesses by given the same name in different countries??? If those in America can get the CDC to stand up and publically define what ME is and then get their doctors to give them the correct diagnoses. That may force England to have to then separate the CFS ones out from the ME ones as after all Wessely and all that will not want their psychological ME patients to have an illness which is being recognised as being serious and a viral thing in America.

    The CFS Association in America should be getting the American government and CDC to define publically what ME is and how it differs from CFS. ME NEEDS to be on the government website and being addressed there properly. People need to be asking "WHY!" .. why isnt it there???

    If the CFS Association representing also ME throu they are separate illnesses? If so.. maybe a name change there is needed to aknowledge the two different illnesses.

    People need to make it clear that they probably have ME not CFS ... get your good doctors to be contacting the CDC.
    It would be even better if the media could get hold of this confusion and what appears to be that the CDC does not wish for ME patients to really know that they have ME and not CFS.
  7. Except that the WPI has already tied XMRV to CFS. It may be CCC CFS, but it's still CFS.
  8. Cloud

    Cloud Guest

    This problem with the CDC separating ME from CFS goes back to the very beginning of their creation of CFS in the late 1980's. These attempts to turn a devastating disease into a non illness have been vehemently criticized by good doctors and patients since the beginning of this charade. Oslers Web is a good resource on some of this history and here are a few links on the subject.


  9. aruschima

    aruschima I know nothing


See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page