Discussion in 'Action Alerts and Advocacy' started by AndyPR, Sep 25, 2016.
Interesting. Their 'strict criterion for recovery' claim was always such pure bullshit.
So, is it up to the university to decide if it should withdraw the article- have I understood it correctly?
Tks. Very interesting.
I take it the author's first language is not English, but that still doesn't account for all of the ways in which this passage is confused.
It seems a mistake to focus on anything other that their 'recovery' overlapping with the trial entry critieria.
You can also try a Google Site Search
Separate names with a comma.