1. 50 experts and 171 advocates oppose the HHS/IOM Contract to re-define ME/CFS.
    Check out our IOM Contract Forum for the latest news and to join the campaign.
In Brief: Muscles and the 'myalgia' in ME/CFS
In the first in a new series of 'In Brief' articles, Andrew Gladman provides a helpful insight into the science behind fairly common topics and explores how they relate to ME/CFS. This time he looks at the muscles, exploring how our reported symptoms might be associated with our...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

"Biomarkers revealed as red herrings are still treated like smoking guns"

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Dolphin, Jun 3, 2011.

  1. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,200
    Likes:
    3,826
    John Ioannidis was one of the authors. He's an interesting researcher in my opinion. He has a degree in mathematics. He often challenges the status quo.

    Dolphin, Jun 3, 2011
    #1
  2. Dolphin

    Dolphin Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,200
    Likes:
    3,826
    Abstract

    Here's the abstract - but the other article is easier to read

    Dolphin, Jun 3, 2011
    #2
  3. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,758
    Likes:
    3,860
    Thanks.

    Reminds me of the "CFS = Depression" meme which is still going strong amongst doctors, despite the fact that the researchers like Wessely who had promoted it have long since abandoned it. (Isn't there some Wessely quote like: "Whatever's wrong with these patients, it's not depression.")

    It's a pain.
    Esther12, Jun 3, 2011
    #3
  4. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,143
    Likes:
    1,360
    Australia
    Ah, John P. A. Ioannidis of "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False" fame.
    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124


    "Comparison of Effect Sizes Associated With Biomarkers Reported in Highly Cited Individual Articles and in Subsequent Meta-analyses":
    http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/305/21/2200.short

    The whole scenario of the relative risks being magnitudes of order in the highly cited papers (published in top journals), compared to the subsequent meta-analyses is a clear result of publication/citation biases.
    Snow Leopard, Jun 3, 2011
    #4

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page