• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

BHT as a antiviral for lipid encapsulated viruses

Messages
30
Does anyone have any experience with BHT as an antiviral? I have been taking it for a couple weeks now and have been experiencing some headaches but I am not able to say much else about it.

I have read some anecdotal reports of people recovering from hep C infection and also someone who said they had a "Lazarus like resurrection" from the CFS symptoms for several months following 2100 mg a day treatment with the substance
 

Hip

Senior Member
Messages
17,865
I looked at butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) as a possible antiviral for use with herpes family viruses, such as cytomegalovirus.

However, I came to the conclusion that if you want to play safe, you should not exceed 19 mg of DHT per day, and unfortunately that dose is not really high enough to have any useful antiviral effects.

You can take a higher dose of BHT, in order to boost the antiviral effects, but then there is a safety question mark, as very high doses of BHT can cause liver cancer.

I came to this conclusion as follows:
This study found that you get a 90% deactivation of cytomegalovirus when using 40 micrograms of BHT per ml, which works out to an oral dose of around 1.6 grams of BHT, assuming 100% absorption in the gut (since the normal human body contains around 40 liters of fluids).

So a dose of around 1.6 grams of BHT per day is what you would need for a decent antiviral effect.

But regarding the safety of such a dose:

This paper said that the NOAEL safe intakes for BHT are 25 mg per kg of body weight per day. For a 75 kilo person, that NOAEL limit corresponds to a maximum daily intake of around 1.9 grams of BHT per day. However, the NOAEL limit is defined the highest dose which still produces no adverse effects — which means that if you go slightly higher than the NOAEL dose, the adverse effects begin. The adverse effects of too high a dose of BHT are the development of hepatocellular carcinomas (liver cancer).

So because the NOAEL safe intake level is the very limit after which things become unsafe, you probably don't really want to be taking any substances at doses near their NOAEL limit, especially when liver cancer is involved.

The acceptable daily intake or ADI is another measure for safe intake — and a far more cautious one. The ADI safe intake for BHT is set much lower, at just 0.25 mg per kg per day. For a 75 kilo person, that ADI limit corresponds to a maximum daily intake of just around 19 mg of DHT per day — which is safe, but unfortunately not really high enough for antiviral purposes.


However, there does seem to be some contradictory research though: these two studies found BHT had no cancer inducing effects:
Bioassay of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) for possible carcinogenicity
Chronic toxicity of butylated hydroxytoluene in Wistar rats

But these two studies found BHT did have cancer inducing effects:
The effects of dietary butylated hydroxytoluene on liver and colon tumor development in mice
A metabolite of butylated hydroxytoluene with potent tumor-promoting activity in mouse lung
 
Last edited:

undcvr

Senior Member
Messages
822
Location
NYC
it depends on whether the virus u want it to work on is lipid coated or not. I think hpv does not have a lipid coat but the herpesviruses do. So it shud only be able to work in the latter not the former.

Delano Report has some good articles on it and guidelines.