picante
Senior Member
- Messages
- 829
- Location
- Helena, MT USA
I have observed that bringing autism into a discussion of vaccine dangers is a red herring. It is always used to distract people from the more general dangers of immune overstimulation and injecting people with neurotoxins. If you really want to know the negative results of overvaccinating people, look at the cases brought before the vaccine court. A victim must fall within fairly narrow parameters to ever get to vaccine court, so there are many negative results you won't see there. But it's a place to start, since the VAERS reporting system is so underutilized as to be almost useless.
That said, I was very interested to hear a bit about your child who was born with autism, Kina.
What we need is a database answering the question: How many people are permanently injured? Unfortunately, there is no support within the FDA, the CDC, or the pharmaceutical industry for such a thing. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil is their approach.
Some people are working very hard on exactly that. Unfortunately, the voice of reason gets drowned out by industry- and media-induced hysteria.
Case in point: If the medical industry was the tiniest bit interested in stopping measles outbreaks altogether, they would be checking to see whether these people have wild virus (which only comes from out of the country these days) or vaccine-strain virus. And then they would take appropriate steps based on which virus it is.
The problem for industry is that they don't want you & me to know that those who've been recently vaccinated for measles are shedding the virus. Instead of admitting that vaccine-strain measles is out there running around, they claim that it originates from unvaccinated kids. Sorry Charlie, but it has to come from either vaccinated kids or from out of the country.
That said, I was very interested to hear a bit about your child who was born with autism, Kina.
What we need is a database answering the question: How many people are permanently injured? Unfortunately, there is no support within the FDA, the CDC, or the pharmaceutical industry for such a thing. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil is their approach.
There is a safe way and a reckless way to vaccinate.
We are careering further and further into recklessness, for nothing more than profit.
Rather than creating and engaging in false polemics, why are we not, as a global culture, doing everything we can
to ensure the safest, most beneficial practice for all?
Some people are working very hard on exactly that. Unfortunately, the voice of reason gets drowned out by industry- and media-induced hysteria.
Case in point: If the medical industry was the tiniest bit interested in stopping measles outbreaks altogether, they would be checking to see whether these people have wild virus (which only comes from out of the country these days) or vaccine-strain virus. And then they would take appropriate steps based on which virus it is.
The problem for industry is that they don't want you & me to know that those who've been recently vaccinated for measles are shedding the virus. Instead of admitting that vaccine-strain measles is out there running around, they claim that it originates from unvaccinated kids. Sorry Charlie, but it has to come from either vaccinated kids or from out of the country.