I doubt many people are still following this thread, so it's a good place to let off steam!
I've just woken late after a restless night feeling nauseous - one of the delights of a mild bout of PEM.
I'm lying here in bed looking at the threads I'm following with messages to catch up on. And I see the words 'Acceptance and Commitment therapy' and I feel more nauseous.
There's something about those words 'Acceptance and Commitment' that comes across to me as religious / judgemental / superior, we know what's good for you / illness is your fault, you miserable sinner / paternalistic or parental /controlling ...
They seem like a softer, more insidious version of 'cognitive behaviour therapy' which implies (to me) correction of misbehaviour or sin / judgement / making the recipient more conforming, socially acceptable etc.
Both the titles ACT and CBT make me want to run a mile from the brainwashing offered by do-gooders. Just like I ran a mile from the 'we are miserable sinners and there is no help in us' and 'all things bright and beautiful' of my childhood religious upbringing.
I can see that in the hands of an ethical, well trained and empathetic therapist, these methods can be tools to help people cope with whatever situation they are in, mentally or socially. Though I don't think a really good therapist needs the straightjacket of a 'method'.
But they seem to be absolutely designed to be formulaic, easily administered in a mindless way, cheap, brief and ultimately damaging process that gets patients to fill in their blasted questionnaires 'correctly', but that in the long run will leave patients blaming themselves when the problem re-asserts itself.
And I probably shouldn't write comments here when I'm feeling grumpy. But I know I can because my readers understand. Bless you all. (not in a religious way
).