P2P, or not P2P, that is the question
As the 16 January, 2015 deadline for responding to the controversial P2P draft report draws near, and in the interests of balance and representing the whole community, Phoenix Rising presents two differing views on how to react. Today, Clark Ellis flags up important content to...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

99/101 CFS patients in SCIENCE Paper had XMRV infection

Discussion in 'XMRV Research and Replication Studies' started by DysautonomiaXMRV, Jan 27, 2010.

  1. firefly


    XRMV in 33 PCR Negative CFS Patients from Science paper

    19/33 Antibodies in Plasma
    30/33 Transmitable Virus in Plasma
    10/33 Protein Expression (Latent Virus)

    Ok, so this makes sense, but of these three tests, which one corresponds to the "culture" test done by VIPdx? Is it the Protein expression (10/33) or the Transmissable Virus in Plasma (30/33).

    Really what I'm getting at, is, what are the statistical odds of testing negative for both PCR and Culture, and still testing positive for Antibodies. It seems to me that if the VIPdx culture test is equivalent to the Virus in Plasma test, and I tested negative on that, then the odds are pretty low. But, if the VIPdx culture test = Protein expression then the odds seems higher.

    Not a statistician, by any stretch, so my logic may be entirely off, but if anyone has insight on this, great.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page