Dr. Bateman answers IOM questions from the community: Part 1
Clark Ellis brings us Part 1 of an interview with Dr. Lucinda Bateman, where she answered questions posed by the patient community ...
Discuss the article on the Forums.

200 page parliamentary report on RCTs and problems with spin

Discussion in 'Other Health News and Research' started by Esther12, Sep 28, 2013.

  1. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,697
    Likes:
    7,294
    I've not read it all... just been going through looking at bits related to protocols. A lot of protocol stuff, but almost nothing on what to do when researchers deviate from their protocols.

    I've had to correct the format a lot, but there could still be glitches- sorry:

    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/104/104.pdf


    p37-38

    ON problems with relying only on peer reviewed journals for publication:

    p39



    p110




    p135 (written Sense About Science testimony)



    p144 (further SAS written testimony)
     
    Valentijn and Sean like this.
  2. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,706
    Likes:
    16,254
    Logan, Queensland, Australia
    Hmmm, should we make a checklist? Then show for each of these points the PACE trials succeeded or failed? Because at first read it looks like PACE is a fail, fail, fail.
     
    Valentijn, Sean and Sasha like this.

See more popular forum discussions.

Share This Page