What an idiot I was
Those of us pathologically wedded to the truth and a sense of justice do find it hard to realise so many people in positions of power do not feel the same sense of adherence to such notions.
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
What an idiot I was
maybe he didn't bother to read the articles but just wrote something in support of his friends.
Programme Manager for population sciences and public health
Dr Neha Issar-Brown - Neha.Issar-Brown@headoffice.mrc.ac.uk
Population sciences and public health research with generic health relevance including:
- Lifestyle and socioeconomic impacts on health
- Behavioural research
- Health inequalities
- Chronic diseases including multimorbidity
- Areas of generic health relevance relevant to above (including longitudinal studies, population and disease cohorts)
He seemed to think that outcome switching was the only issue so maybe he didn't bother to read the articles but just wrote something in support of his friends.
What is perhaps made obvious by Macleod's response and CoI is that he is prepared to support his friends allowing them to retain a publication on PLOS without releasing the data.
I did wonder if it is noticeable that two organisations that have failed to ensure good research standards are making statements to back PACE.
It looks like Dr Issar-Brown has some responsibility for research areas that seem to intersect with PACE.
made me think of a programme I watched last night
Reading the comments from the honorable gentlemen of the SMC made me think of a programme I watched last night commemorating the Battle of Passchendaele ( I know how S.W likes his history). I was reading about it and found this:
"British high command was a top down system that prevented the free flow of information, paralysed any discussion, made innovation difficult and allowed faulty decisions to stand even when the commanders at lower levels knew that there were serious problems." Sounds familiar.
Reading the comments from the honourable gentlemen of the SMC made me think of a programme I watched last night commemorating the Battle of Passchendaele ( I know how S.W likes his history).
Looks like they're trying pretty hard to me. They just realise that, tactically, open debate of the issues surrounding the PACE trial is a terrible tactic for them. They'll be doing a lot behind closed doors too.
Whoops Let me guess ... one of them got undue credit for the paper, so they didn't really work together?@JohntheJack has noted that MaClown & Michael Sharpe worked together at Edinburgh University and written papers together.
And retire. Let the adults start cleaning up the mess.We'll move on when they admit they've not conducted a best-practise study (and greatly exaggerated their results) and apologise.