http://bjgp.org/content/66/651/511.2
eLetter to British Journal of General Practice by Peter Campion
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687229 Published 1 October 2016
About eLetters:
(ETA: thread on the article by Geraghty and Esmail here.)
eLetter to British Journal of General Practice by Peter Campion
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687229 Published 1 October 2016
Geraghty and Esmail have done well to draw attention to the substantial biomedical literature now extant around chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).1 They are right to point out that the dominant model has been a biopsychosocial (BPS) one, and that this has led to persistent disagreement between doctors and patients. What is particularly salutary is the absence of any advance in therapy, so that they recommend, for example, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), but with the caveat that it might not be helpful in individual cases. CFS continues to challenge GPs by its resilience to treatment, but colleagues will be well advised to take on board the changing evidence for pathophysiology set out in this article. Many of the cited papers are accessible and worth reading, such as the authors’ reference 8,2 and in that paper, reference 38.3
The bottom line for me is respect for the patient, and humility in the face of lack of knowledge about the precise causes of CFS, which is clearly anyway a heterogeneous group of conditions.
About eLetters:
eLetters is an online forum for ongoing peer review. Submission of eLetters are open to all health care professionals and experts in related fields
(ETA: thread on the article by Geraghty and Esmail here.)
Last edited: