• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

"new insight into why women are more likely than men to develop autoimmune diseases such as MS"

Kyla

ᴀɴɴɪᴇ ɢꜱᴀᴍᴩᴇʟ
Messages
721
Location
Canada
http://www.northwestern.edu/newscenter/stories/2015/05/protecting-women-from-multiple-sclerosis.html

CHICAGO --- An innocent mistake made by a graduate student in a Northwestern Medicine lab (she accidentally used male mice instead of female mice during an experiment) has led scientists to a novel discovery that offers new insight into why women are more likely than men to develop autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis (MS).

The finding, detailed in a paper published in The Journal of Immunology, focuses on a type of white blood cell, the innate lymphoid cell, that exhibits different immune activities in males versus females.

MS is a disease that affects the brain and spinal cord and is the result of a dysregulated immune response. Using a mouse model of MS in which only females get disease, this study showed that innate lymphoid cells are activated and protect male mice from the disease. Although female mice have these same cells, they remain inactive and do not protect them.

The research opens up new avenues for investigation into sex-determined disease susceptibility and could one day lead to better therapies for both men and women with MS and other autoimmune diseases.

“Women are three to four times more likely than men to develop MS, and much of the current research focuses on the question, ‘Why do females get worse disease?’” said Melissa Brown, lead author of the study and professor of microbiology-immunology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

“Now, thanks to a serendipitous moment in the laboratory, we are approaching this research from the opposite way, asking, ‘Why are males protected from disease?’” Brown said. “Understanding the mechanisms that limit disease in men can provide information that could be used in future therapy to block disease progression in women.”

Like most laboratories that study the mouse model of MS, female mice were used in almost all of Brown’s experiments.

“When we induce the disease in this strain of female mice, virtually 100 percent of them get very sick,” Brown said. “Male mice either get no disease or very little, so MS researchers typically use females in their studies.”

A few years ago, a new graduate student in Brown’s laboratory was asked to run an experiment using two groups of female mice. One group was normal; the other had a genetic mutation in a growth factor receptor (c-kit) that prevented the development of a subset of immune cells.

Previous experiments in Brown’s lab showed that female mice with the mutation didn’t get as sick as normal mice, and Brown was looking into reasons why. However, instead of using females, the graduate student chose male littermates from each group.

“It was an honest mistake, but the results were striking; the male mice with the mutation got very, very sick,” Brown said. “Because this strain of male mice never get very sick, I thought there was some sort of mistake, so I asked the student to repeat the experiment.”

The results were the same. Brown and colleagues realized that the mutation was behaving differently in males and females. Brown asked Abigail Russi, a Feinberg MD/PhD student working in her lab, to investigate further.

Russi found that mice with the c-kit mutation lacked type 2 innate lymphoid cells. These cells are normally present in bone marrow, lymph nodes and the thymus of both males and females. The researchers think that in males these cells produce a protein that may help to protect from the disease by interfering with the damaging immune response.

“In the paper we show that when these cells are missing in the males with the mutation, that changes the whole immune response of the male animals and causes this lack of protection,” Russi said. “We are now looking at what activates these cells preferentially in males and not in females. The next question is can we activate the innate lymphoid cells in females to decrease disease susceptibility?”

This isn’t the first sex difference study in the field of MS research. In the 1990s, scientists found that testosterone was a protective hormone for women with MS, but long-term treatment of women with MS with testosterone is not a viable option because of undesirable side effects.

Type 2 innate lymphoid cells have been well studied in allergy, where they are thought to promote allergic inflammation. But this is the first study to show these cells exhibit sex differences in their activity and actually can protect in autoimmune disease. Early trials are underway, and the scientists are hoping they will find clues to explain potential activators of these cells and whether those activators can be used in therapy.

The findings could lead to a new approach to designing drug therapy that modulates instead of completely suppresses the immune system of MS patients, shifting the response to one that is not so damaging.

“The hope is to target these cells in a sex-specific way and provide a therapy with fewer side effects,” Brown said. “This early research may have implications for understanding other diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, which also show a female bias.”

Other authors of this study are Margaret E. Walker-Caulfield of the Mayo Clinic and Mark E. Ebel of Northwestern.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R21 NS081598-01 and NRSA fellowship F31 NS084691-02) and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG-4684A5).

- See more at: http://www.northwestern.edu/newscen...-multiple-sclerosis.html#sthash.KMLs6Ljb.dpuf


Full article in Immunology (open access) here:

http://www.jimmunol.org/content/early/2015/05/13/jimmunol.1500068.full.pdf
 

Ecoclimber

Senior Member
Messages
1,011
Good find! I wonder if this could also be extrapolated to ME/CFS realizing that it is not in the same disease category until autoimmunity is validated and the fact that there are no mouse models to my knowledge available. But, I always been intrigued both in MS, Fibro, and ME/CFS why there are more females in ratio to males. I believe 75%/25% ratio in ME/CFS. What is the common thread linking males with the disease and females while making them unique within their own population? Hmmm...
 

Bob

Senior Member
Messages
16,455
Location
England (south coast)
Russi found that mice with the c-kit mutation lacked type 2 innate lymphoid cells. These cells are normally present in bone marrow, lymph nodes and the thymus of both males and females. The researchers think that in males these cells produce a protein that may help to protect from the disease by interfering with the damaging immune response.

“In the paper we show that when these cells are missing in the males with the mutation, that changes the whole immune response of the male animals and causes this lack of protection,” Russi said. “We are now looking at what activates these cells preferentially in males and not in females. The next question is can we activate the innate lymphoid cells in females to decrease disease susceptibility?”
Type 2 innate lymphoid cells have been well studied in allergy, where they are thought to promote allergic inflammation. But this is the first study to show these cells exhibit sex differences in their activity and actually can protect in autoimmune disease. Early trials are underway, and the scientists are hoping they will find clues to explain potential activators of these cells and whether those activators can be used in therapy.
Keeping in mind that this is just an animal model, so the actual implications are unknown; If both of the above extracts are correct then it suggests that some of the the mechanisms behind MS are the opposite of some the mechanisms behind allergy. i.e. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells promote allergy but protect against MS. But I might have misunderstood - I know nothing about the subject. So are people with allergies less likely to develop MS? That would perhaps be the opposite of the situation with ME, whereby allergies and autoimmunity may be more prevalent in people with ME and may run in families of people with ME?
 
Last edited:

Jonathan Edwards

"Gibberish"
Messages
5,256
Keeping in mind that this is just an animal model, so the actual implications are unknown; If both of the above extracts are correct then it suggests that some of the the mechanisms behind MS are the opposite of some the mechanisms behind allergy. i.e. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells promote allergy but protect against MS. But I might have misunderstood - I know nothing about the subject. So are people with allergies less likely to develop MS? That would perhaps be the opposite of the situation with ME, whereby allergies and autoimmunity may be more prevalent in people with ME and may run in families of people with ME?

The 'MS model' they use involves autoreactive T cells and I am not sure we have evidence for autoreactive T cells in human MS. I tend to be very sceptical about animal models of MS in particular.

Nevertheless, it would make sense for the male/female difference in risk of immune disorders arose from a T cell subset more active in males. I am not so sure how allergy would fit in since I do not think it is more common in males. In terms of human disease I would wonder about CD57+ T cells being relevant. Ankylosing spondylitis is the most male skewed immune disease and probably involves cytotoxic CD8/CD57 cells (hence the MHC I association). CD57 cells are implicated in deleting rogue B cells in follicles so males might be better at weeding out rogue antibody producers. I don't know where c-kit fits in to this though. In general it makes sense for males to be fussier about antibody production - antibodies are not so important to men.
 

Bob

Senior Member
Messages
16,455
Location
England (south coast)
I am not so sure how allergy would fit in since I do not think it is more common in males.
Good point. Reading it again, the article suggests that it's a specific behaviour of type 2 innate lymphoid cells in males that protects against MS ("The researchers think that in males these cells produce a protein that may help to protect from the disease by interfering with the damaging immune response"), rather than e.g. simply the number of cells. It doesn't discuss how the same cells might promote allergies, so it might be via a different mechanism.
 

Marco

Grrrrrrr!
Messages
2,386
Location
Near Cognac, France
“Now, thanks to a serendipitous moment in the laboratory, we are approaching this research from the opposite way, asking, ‘Why are males protected from disease?’” Brown said. “Understanding the mechanisms that limit disease in men can provide information that could be used in future therapy to block disease progression in women.”

Good question, and one worth asking in relation to ME/CFS (and why any putative protection breaks down in some cases).