• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

The powerful placebo effect: fact or fiction?

A.B.

Senior Member
Messages
3,780
This might be of interest to some readers here (especially with so many placebo therapies targeting CFS patients):

In 1955, Henry K. Beecher published the classic work entitled "The Powerful Placebo." Since that time, 40 years ago, the placebo effect has been considered a scientific fact. Beecher was the first scientist to quantify the placebo effect. He claimed that in 15 trials with different diseases, 35% of 1082 patients were satisfactorily relieved by a placebo alone. This publication is still the most frequently cited placebo reference. Recently Beecher's article was reanalyzed with surprising results: In contrast to his claim, no evidence was found of any placebo effect in any of the studies cited by him. There were many other factors that could account for the reported improvements in patients in these trials, but most likely there was no placebo effect whatsoever. False impressions of placebo effects can be produced in various ways. Spontaneous improvement, fluctuation of symptoms, regression to the mean, additional treatment, conditional switching of placebo treatment, scaling bias, irrelevant response variables, answers of politeness, experimental subordination, conditioned answers, neurotic or psychotic misjudgment, psychosomatic phenomena, misquotation, etc. These factors are still prevalent in modern placebo literature. The placebo topic seems to invite sloppy methodological thinking. Therefore awareness of Beecher's mistakes and misinterpretations is essential for an appropriate interpretation of current placebo literature.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?uid=9449934&cmd=showdetailview
 

wdb

Senior Member
Messages
1,392
Location
London
For some time I've been quite skeptical of placebo being this mystical mind/body healing effect. There is another study I read a while ago that found the effect disappeared when objective measures were used.


Is the Placebo Powerless? — An Analysis of Clinical Trials Comparing Placebo with No Treatment

BACKGROUND
Placebo treatments have been reported to help patients with many diseases, but the quality of the evidence supporting this finding has not been rigorously evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS
We found little evidence in general that placebos had powerful clinical effects. Although placebos had no significant effects on objective or binary outcomes, they had possible small benefits in studies with continuous subjective outcomes and for the treatment of pain. Outside the setting of clinical trials, there is no justification for the use of placebos.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
I think there is another thread on this general topic posted just recently. Placebo seems to modify how people feel, not how they function. You could do the same with marijuana - keep 'em stoned. I think some psychiatry is the same - babble talk or babble pills, it makes no difference.