• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Kaleth et al. ('10): No correlations between actometers/6MWT & 2 physical activity instruments (FMS)

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
(Minority interest)

I thought this might be of interest to the odd person e.g. who are interested in similar findings in ME/CFS


Abstract*

Research Papers

Validity and reliability of community health activities model program for seniors and short-form international physical activity questionnaire as physical activity assessment tools in patients with fibromyalgia

Disability and Rehabilitation 2010, Vol. 32, No. 5 , Pages 353-359

Anthony S. Kaleth1, Dennis C. Ang2, Rafael Chakr2, Yan Tong2
1Department of Physical Education, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA
2Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
Correspondence: Anthony S. Kaleth, Department of Physical Education, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 901 West New York Street, Indianapolis 46202-5193, USA. E-mail: akaleth@iupui.edu

Purpose. 

There currently is a paucity of well-validated instruments to quantitatively measure physical activity (PA) levels in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

This study aims to determine the construct validity and test–retest reliability of two self-report physical activity questionnaires [short-form international physical activity questionnaire (s-IPAQ) and community health activities model program for seniors (CHAMPS)] in a fibromyalgia population.

Methods. 

Thirty subjects (mean age 49.1 ± 9.6 years; 90% females) who met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for FMS were invited to participate in the study.

Two-week test–retest reliability was evaluated for the CHAMPS and s-IPAQ. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing PA reported from these questionnaires with data obtained from accelerometry (steps/week, counts/week) and the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT).

Results. 
CHAMPS showed greater test–retest reliability (r = 0.58; p < 0.001) compared with s-IPAQ (r = 0.18; p = 0.15). No significant correlations were observed between the self-report PA questionnaires and the 6-MWT or accelerometry data (p > 0.05).

Conclusions. 

In a fibromyalgia population, the s-IPAQ does not appear to be a reliable and valid PA assessment tool. CHAMPS displayed moderate test–retest reliability; however, no associations were found between CHAMPS and objectives measures of PA.

In view of the known benefits of exercise in patients with FMS, there is a need to develop new measures or validate other existing well-established PA questionnaires.

Keywords

Physical activity, fibromyalgia, CHAMPS, s-IPAQ



Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/09638280903166352


* I gave each sentence its own paragraph