• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of and finding treatments for complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

ALL Countries Please sign the MEA's new petition to NICE:do not classify ME as 'functional'

Jan

Senior Member
Messages
458
Location
Devon UK
My husband & I share the same computer. He has signed the petition.
I can not use the link to sign the petition in my name - it appears to recognise it has previously been signed.
I have tried the link to the ME association page as well - same recognition problem

I have also tried logging off & shutting down the computer - still not allowing me to access the bit where you input your name & email address- we have different email addresses

How do I sign?

I am logged on via fb, at the top right hand side of petition there is an image of my fb avatar, if I click on this it gives me the option to log out.
 

charles shepherd

Senior Member
Messages
2,239
Last edited:
Messages
60
Max Davie: Paediatrician, dad, numpty. Generally in reverse order. Mental health guy at @RCPCHtweets. Mental health tweets: @paedMHassoc Board games: @games4families

Responding to Jonathan Edwards's comment on this thread:

I've invited both Max Davie and Phil Hammond to continue the discussion here.
 

Jonathan Edwards

"Gibberish"
Messages
5,256
I wonder what evidence there is that psychiatric input helps constipation? We have seen that the evidence for CBT helping ME is diddly squat. I wonder how much better it is for constipation!

His original question:

Do functional disorders need to be entirely psychological in origin, or can they be of mixed causation?

Begs the question what you mean by functional - which was the point of my point. If functional defines the causation then that is your answer - whatever that definition is. If it is 'driven by emotion' then that is what it is - whatever it might mean.

I am none the wiser
 

charles shepherd

Senior Member
Messages
2,239
Below is a definition of a functional neurological disorder from the (neurology) section of one NHS website

When I have discussed this with colleagues who are interested in 'functional neurological diseases' the key message from them is that: the neurological symptoms their patients are experiencing are real and often very disabling but there is no evidence of any neurological disease/pathology present

If you have a functional neurological disorder (FND) you may have symptoms that are extremely disabling. Your symptoms also might have started quite suddenly. Often when people with FND are assessed either at a routine appointment or in an emergency, their symptoms may seem to be those of a serious physical disorder, such as a stroke, mini-stroke or multiple sclerosis. These serious neurological diseases may have been mentioned when you first told a clinician about your symptoms.

When investigations such as scans are done to check for these diseases, there are no indications that there is any neurological disease or damage in the nervous system. This indicates to the doctors that the symptoms are functional, but sometimes the doctor will not be sure and refer to a specialist.

The diagnosis of FND is not just made by ruling out physical causes. A thorough clinical assessment will usually provide other clues. The nature of the symptoms, the way they fluctuate with time and the way they evolve, can all give strong hints to the diagnosis of FND. Tests are sometimes required, partly to reassure the doctor and their patient that there is not anything else that could possibly cause the symptoms. Often these tests pick up slight abnormalities that are not relevant to the symptoms, and it is not unusual to acquire several other diagnoses along the way before the true diagnosis is clear. It often takes many years for a diagnosis of FND to be made.
 

Jonathan Edwards

"Gibberish"
Messages
5,256
I don't quite follow that @charles shepherd.

If a functional disorder is one in which there are very real symptoms but there is no pathology that is straightforward. But then there is a suggestion that coming and going symptoms helps make the diagnosis. How can it? Unless of course the diagnosis implies something more - some sort of causation that might come and go. If that is the case, then we need to know what sort of causation they have in mind, that is expected to come and go.

I guess the question is whether benign essential tremor is 'functional'? It is not associated with any pathology as far as I know but is very real. And migraine - is that functional? And what about dyslexia? Or synaethesia? It all seems to me very unclear. And when neurologists blurt out that what it actually means is 'driven by emotion' it becomes clear that all is not very clear.
 

user9876

Senior Member
Messages
4,556
My husband & I share the same computer. He has signed the petition.
I can not use the link to sign the petition in my name - it appears to recognise it has previously been signed.
I have tried the link to the ME association page as well - same recognition problem

I have also tried logging off & shutting down the computer - still not allowing me to access the bit where you input your name & email address- we have different email addresses

How do I sign?

Try using the privacy option of the browser (incognito on Chrome) otherwise deleting cookies may help
 
Last edited:

Aurator

Senior Member
Messages
625
I'm trying to pin down the relationship between medically unexplained symptoms and a functional disorder.

My understanding is that the first is a case of "we can't find anything medically wrong with you to explain why you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting", while the second goes a step further with "we can't find anything medically wrong with you and we think the reason you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting is that you're a loon".

If we take away all the verbal window dressing that's being used to foist these conditions on the world (window dressing that is no doubt intended to make the diagnoses sound acceptably scientific) is my explanation anywhere near the true position?
 
Last edited:

Countrygirl

Senior Member
Messages
5,429
Location
UK
"we can't find anything medically wrong with you and we think the reason you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting is that you're a loon".

Spot on!

And..........


medically unexplained symptoms = "we can't find anything medically wrong with you and what we can't find can't exist.....ever.......so we think the reason you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting is because you are a fruitloop"
 

TiredSam

The wise nematode hibernates
Messages
2,677
Location
Germany
Do functional disorders need to be entirely psychological in origin, or can they be of mixed causation?
Functional disorders arise when a psychologist who promotes functional disorders says "you have a functional disorder". The psychologist then has no remedy except to blame / abuse the patient for not getting better. Some psychologists seem happy to make a career out of this, and whenever a functional disorder is found to have a physical cause (MS, stomach ulcers, AIDS, etc etc) they just move on to the next set of symptoms where their more honest colleagues currently have to say "I don't know".

Determing whether functional disorders are psychological in origin or of mixed causation would involve examing the mind of the functional disorders promoting psychologist. Ugh.

And what about dyslexia? Or synaethesia?
I've sometimes wished I suffered from synaesthesia - took me years to get hold of A.R.Luria's book "The Mind of a Mnemonist" in the days before you could just find it on the internet, been fascinated by it ever since. Always thought of it as a superpower I'd like to have rather than a disorder.
 

PracticingAcceptance

Senior Member
Messages
1,858
Can neurologists help us, with services & knowledge as they are now? If I got referred to a neurologist, what could they do to help? I have trouble speaking sometimes, and remembering, and of course concentrating. I think of CFS as neurological because my main symptoms are. But is there any point in me seeing a neurologist?

Yes there needs to be more research into the neurology of ME. But can they actually help diagnose and treat us? In terms of understanding & reassurance, I don't know if I need to get that from a neurologist as long as I can get this from a CFS specialist.

Is this petition about the principle of ME being mislabeled as functional, or is it about the field of neurology taking on ME? Because I doubt neurologists will see ME patients until they have protocol to act by, which will only happen when there's enough research. Right?

I'm making the assumption that neurologists don't really touch ME patients right now, because they can't help as things are now - please correct me if I'm wrong.

The NHS is under a huge strain as it is. They have to do only what is necessary. If calling ME functional is a convenient way for them to not treat us, then I'd object to that. But if this is just about not referring us to neurologists because they don't have any help to give us anyway because of a lack of understanding/research, then I'm alright with this guideline.

I don't want to sign a petition for the purpose of being seen by a neurologist if they can't help me anyway.
I'd sign a petition about neurology research for ME.
I'd sign a petition about ME being mislabeled as functional.
But I'm not going to sign something which I don't understand enough of the detail about.

Happy to be persuaded and informed, if anyone can help.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
Begs the question what you mean by functional - which was the point of my point.
Bipsers (biopsychosocialites) co-opt terms. They are forever redefining the same underlying concept, ever since Charcot. Then they argue on the commonly understood meanings of the terms, while hauling out their technical meanings at the punchline.

Functional is perfectly valid as a term, as is UFO. Calling UFOs flying saucers without hard evidence is the same leap as calling functional disorders psychiatric, although I give the flying saucer proponents better odds of being right.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
My understanding is that the first is a case of "we can't find anything medically wrong with you to explain why you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting", while the second goes a step further with "we can't find anything medically wrong with you and we think the reason you're getting the symptoms you say you're getting is that you're a loon".
This serves the purpose of a too hard basket. It also serves insurance providers who in many cases can limit coverage on psychiatric disorders. That is one of the reasons some insurance companies are involved in promoting these ideas. Then we have the long history of Freudian claims, debunked and debunked, but they live on. Like zombies. Hence this is a case of Zombie Science, science and pseudoscience living on beyond its use by date due to vested interests.
 

Orla

Senior Member
Messages
708
Location
Ireland
Can neurologists help us, with services & knowledge as they are now? If I got referred to a neurologist, what could they do to help? I have trouble speaking sometimes, and remembering, and of course concentrating. I think of CFS as neurological because my main symptoms are. But is there any point in me seeing a neurologist?

Yes there needs to be more research into the neurology of ME. But can they actually help diagnose and treat us? In terms of understanding & reassurance, I don't know if I need to get that from a neurologist as long as I can get this from a CFS specialist.

Is this petition about the principle of ME being mislabeled as functional, or is it about the field of neurology taking on ME? Because I doubt neurologists will see ME patients until they have protocol to act by, which will only happen when there's enough research. Right?

I'm making the assumption that neurologists don't really touch ME patients right now, because they can't help as things are now - please correct me if I'm wrong.

The NHS is under a huge strain as it is. They have to do only what is necessary. If calling ME functional is a convenient way for them to not treat us, then I'd object to that. But if this is just about not referring us to neurologists because they don't have any help to give us anyway because of a lack of understanding/research, then I'm alright with this guideline.

I don't want to sign a petition for the purpose of being seen by a neurologist if they can't help me anyway.
I'd sign a petition about neurology research for ME.
I'd sign a petition about ME being mislabeled as functional.
But I'm not going to sign something which I don't understand enough of the detail about.

Happy to be persuaded and informed, if anyone can help.

You need to go back to read the first post in this thread which has 2 useful links. "diagnosing" patients with a functional disorder (i.e. hysteria) is a way to dump patients with neurological problems on primary care or possibly some "specialist" nurses or the like.

The main problem with it is that it is dangerous damaging nonsense. Who wants their doctor to think their symptoms are all in their mind? http://www.meassociation.org.uk/201...-not-a-functional-disorder-27-september-2017/
 

Invisible Woman

Senior Member
Messages
1,267
@lior

I'm in the UK. From my experience and input from others over the years neurologists are firmly in the BPSers camp.

While NICE is finally reviewing their guidelines on ME, there is an insidious movement afoot to conflate ME with Functional Somatic Syndrome / MUPS /MUS.

If we let this neurology guideline go unchallenged then the risk is your GP may consider a referral to neurology, see the guidelines and from then on label you with FSS. The only referral you'll get from there on in is likely to be CBT.

Depending on your GP it could effectively block you from ever being referred to specialists again - even for an additional & unrelated condition.

That's my reading of the situation anyway.
 

Cheshire

Senior Member
Messages
1,129
Jon Stone is the neurologist that "renewed" theory and care of functional neurologic disorders.
Here's what he writes about "CFS/ME" on his website:

Tiredness is a very common symptom in patients with functional neurological symptoms.

Often despite many more obvious symptoms, people say that it is the tiredness and fatigue that really holds them back day to day.

Tiredness in this situation can also be thought of as another symptom related to a problem with nervous system functioning.

When tiredness like this occurs
• with no other neurological symptoms
• for more than 6 months
• not due to a detectable underlying medical or neurological condition
then it is called Chronic Fatigue Syndrome / M.E. (CFS/ME)

Fatigue may occur as part of anxiety or depression, although its important to say that you don’t need to be anxious or depressed to have persistent and severe fatigue

However, many of the principles of treating CFS/ME which have been proven to be effective in clinical trials are likely to be effective in patients with functional neurological symptoms

There are some useful resources for patients with this diagnosis. If you want to try to understand more about this or learn practical ways to manage your fatigue then I can recommend the following book available online:

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS/ME) (The Facts) by Frankie Campling, Michael Sharpe. Oxford University Press

Services for patients with CFS/ME are patchy. However, they may be better than services for people with functional neurological symptoms. You may wish to find out from your doctor whether there is a treatment service locally for CFS/ME as this may be a route to treating your other symptoms.

http://www.neurosymptoms.org/#/fatigue/4533053151