• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

The Mental Elf: A PACE-gate or an editorial without perspectives? Kjetil Gundro Brurberg

Esther12

Senior Member
Messages
13,774
Only that it's impossible. They didn't record anything re: heart rate or lactate, or if they did, they've been keeping it a secret. No objective data was published re: PACE.

They did publish a graph on "Borg/%max HR reached" in the mediation paper.

There's also the fitness data, employment data and 6 mwt data. I can see nothing on lactate levels.
 
Last edited:

Snow Leopard

Hibernating
Messages
5,902
Location
South Australia
From the aforementioned "secondary" mediation analysis

We found that fitness and perception of exertion did not appear to mediate treatment effects, but that timed walking distance, assessed for the first time in our study, mediated the effect of GET. This suggests that increasing tolerance of physical activity might produce benefit without improving physical fitness. These findings are consistent with those of previous studies.8,9,32 A randomised controlled trial of GET for chronic fatigue syndrome 8,16 found that those who rated themselves as better were no fitter or stronger than the rest. A second trial of GET also suggested that physical reconditioning was not a mediator of the effect of treatment, but that a reduction in symptom focusing and increased exercise tolerance (as assessed by maximum heart rate achieved with exercise) mediated change in mental and physical fatigue.9 It must be acknowledged, however, that the walking test might not reflect activity or exercise levels in everyday life and might provide an explanation for why Wiborg and colleagues 33 found no evidence that actometer-measured physical activity mediated the effect of CBT.

tl;dr: the PACE trial showed that 6mwd is not a valid test of fitness/physical function and changes of questionnaire answering behaviour after CBT/GET is not mediated by "physical reconditioning".