• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Study shows why exercise magnifies exhaustion for cfs patients

Denise

Senior Member
Messages
1,095
@Aurator - I haven't read the release or the article (paywall) but fwiw - here is the abstract:

Pain. 2015 Feb 5. [Epub ahead of print]

Evidence for Sensitized Fatigue Pathways in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Staud R1, Mokthech M, Price DD, Robinson ME.

Author information
Abstract

Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) frequently demonstrate intolerance to physical exertion that is often reported as increased and long-lasting fatigue. As no specific metabolic alterations have been identified in CFS patients we hypothesized that sensitized fatigue pathways become activated during exercise corresponding with increased fatigue.After exhausting handgrip-exercise, muscle-metabolites were trapped in the forearm tissues of 39 CFS patients and 29 NC by sudden occlusion for up to 5min. A non-occlusive condition of similar duration was used as control. Repeated fatigue and pain ratings were obtained before and after exercise. Mechanical and heat hyperalgesia were assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST).All subjects fulfilled the 1994 Fukuda-Criteria for CFS. NC and CFS subjects exercised for 6.6 (2.4) and 7.0 (2.7) min (p>.05). Forearm occlusion lasted for 4.7 (1.3) and 4.9 (1.8) min in NC and CFS subjects, respectively (p>.05). Whereas fatigue ratings of CFS subjects increased from 4.8 (2.0) to 5.6 (2.1) VAS units during forearm occlusion, they decreased from 5.0 (1.8) to 4.8 (2.0) VAS units during the control condition without occlusion (p=.04). A similar time course of fatigue ratings was observed in NC (p>.05) although their ratings were significantly lower than those of CFS subjects (p<.001). QST-testing demonstrated heat and mechanical hyperalgesia in CFS subjects.Our findings provide indirect evidence for significant contributions of peripheral tissues to the increased exercise related fatigue in CFS patients consistent with sensitization of fatigue pathways. Future interventions that reduce sensitization of fatigue pathways in CFS patients may be of therapeutic benefit.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659069
 

Valentijn

Senior Member
Messages
15,786
Is anyone able to say whether there is anything revelatory in this recent study? The title suggests new biological insights were gained, but the summary in the link seems to be saying that self-reported fatigue scores were all that was relied on.

http://news.ufl.edu/archive/2015/03...on-for-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-patients.html
They're saying our brain pathways which signal fatigue are overactive. They blocked circulation while pumping a hand-held device, and did the same thing with the other arm, without the block. "Fatigue" patients reported more muscle fatigue in the blocked arm.

Then they go on to make a bunch of unsubstantiated guesses, and treat them as fact. It was also run by a psych department, and they think that CFS is all about fatigue, so it's probably a bad cohort.
 

Bob

Senior Member
Messages
16,455
Location
England (south coast)
I haven't read the full paper - so I'm not sure if they measured blood metabolites and found them to be increased in CFS patients - but if they didn't measure metabolites, then all this study demonstrates is that fatigued individuals experience more fatigue after exercise than healthy individuals.

I quote from the news article:
"“We found that the fatigued individuals reported more fatigue than the non-fatigued individuals during the exercise, and also found that they had more pain compared to the non-fatigued individuals,” Staud said."

I repeat the crucial conclusion of the lead investigator:
"We found that the fatigued individuals reported more fatigue than the non-fatigued individuals..."

lol, how much did they get paid to come to that conclusion?!?
 

Valentijn

Senior Member
Messages
15,786
I haven't read the full paper - so I'm not sure if they measured blood metabolites and found them to be increased in CFS patients - but if they didn't measure metabolites, then all this study demonstrates is that fatigued individuals experience more fatigue after exercise than healthy individuals.
It doesn't look like they drew any blood or measured metabolities. They just assume that they successfully blocked them by inflating a blood pressure cuff.
 

Sherlock

Boswellia for lungs and MC stabllizing
Messages
1,287
Location
k8518704 USA
Last edited:

Valentijn

Senior Member
Messages
15,786
They do not seem to have done the necessary controls. Maybe PWME find having a cuff on more unpleasant than healthy controls?
It certainly does get a lot more painful when my swelling is worse. During my Cranberry Episode it was quite agonizing just to have a band around my arm so that blood could be drawn from the back of my hand.
 

*GG*

senior member
Messages
6,389
Location
Concord, NH
@Aurator - I haven't read the release or the article (paywall) but fwiw - here is the abstract:

Pain. 2015 Feb 5. [Epub ahead of print]

Evidence for Sensitized Fatigue Pathways in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
Staud R1, Mokthech M, Price DD, Robinson ME.

Author information
Abstract

Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) frequently demonstrate intolerance to physical exertion that is often reported as increased and long-lasting fatigue.

As no specific metabolic alterations have been identified in CFS patients we hypothesized that sensitized fatigue pathways become activated during exercise corresponding with increased fatigue.After exhausting handgrip-exercise, muscle-metabolites were trapped in the forearm tissues of 39 CFS patients and 29 NC by sudden occlusion for up to 5min.

A non-occlusive condition of similar duration was used as control. Repeated fatigue and pain ratings were obtained before and after exercise. Mechanical and heat hyperalgesia were assessed by quantitative sensory testing (QST).All subjects fulfilled the 1994 Fukuda-Criteria for CFS. NC and CFS subjects exercised for 6.6 (2.4) and 7.0 (2.7) min (p>.05).

Forearm occlusion lasted for 4.7 (1.3) and 4.9 (1.8) min in NC and CFS subjects, respectively (p>.05). Whereas fatigue ratings of CFS subjects increased from 4.8 (2.0) to 5.6 (2.1) VAS units during forearm occlusion, they decreased from 5.0 (1.8) to 4.8 (2.0) VAS units during the control condition without occlusion (p=.04).

A similar time course of fatigue ratings was observed in NC (p>.05) although their ratings were significantly lower than those of CFS subjects (p<.001). QST-testing demonstrated heat and mechanical hyperalgesia in CFS subjects.

Our findings provide indirect evidence for significant contributions of peripheral tissues to the increased exercise related fatigue in CFS patients consistent with sensitization of fatigue pathways. Future interventions that reduce sensitization of fatigue pathways in CFS patients may be of therapeutic benefit.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659069

Just breaking this up, for ease of reading :)

GG
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
"As no specific metabolic alterations have been found in CFS patients..."

Van Ness et al have repeatedly shown metabolic abnormalities in their 2-day CPET studies -- that have been replicated by Vermoulen and by Keller.
Not to mention the Lights' studies. They have shown specific biochemical alterations linked to fatigue and pain signalling. Their research is much higher quality.

As @Valentijn points out, they make a lot of assumptions. They may or may not be right. Its not a great study. However I have not read the full paper so I cannot be sure of much as the abstract may not accurately reflect the actual study. That happens a lot.
 

aimossy

Senior Member
Messages
1,106
They do not seem to have done the necessary controls. Maybe PWME find having a cuff on more unpleasant than healthy controls?
I do find it a lot more uncomfortable than it ever was when well. I can't handle much restriction or pressure for long. Limbs feel congested.

Does anyone as an aside remember which thread JE and Alex and a few others were talking about cortisol receptors? I had a weird experience with a cortisol lowering drug that some might find interesting.
 
Last edited:

aimossy

Senior Member
Messages
1,106
Thanks, I will wait till I come across that type of discussion again then @alex3619 I don't want to derail this thread further.