Bob
Senior Member
- Messages
- 16,455
- Location
- England (south coast)
I've noticed that there is no substance to any of the negative comments attached to Jennie.
There just seems to be a generalised condemnation based purely on a past association with the CAA.
Our opinions and our advocacy work evolve over time.
Instead of speculating about individuals, and smearing someone's character (for past associations; or for 'liking' someone's post; or for the 'tone' of a post) why don't we assess the merits of the work that people carry out, and focus on the IOM committee itself?
I'll judge all IOM presentations on their content.
There just seems to be a generalised condemnation based purely on a past association with the CAA.
Our opinions and our advocacy work evolve over time.
Instead of speculating about individuals, and smearing someone's character (for past associations; or for 'liking' someone's post; or for the 'tone' of a post) why don't we assess the merits of the work that people carry out, and focus on the IOM committee itself?
I'll judge all IOM presentations on their content.
Last edited: