Dreambirdie,
I don't really know if it's worth it or not. I had to raise money to pay for it, and while it is comprehensive, that's kind of what also makes it so complicated. The results are all run through the same statistical analysis based on their 'norms', and, well, although Rich helped me with analysis as much as possible, here we are 2 1/2 years later still trying to figure it out. So many different pathways and or enzymes affected by so many different heavy metals and/or missing nutrients.
Just one example: It said that I needed folate (duh), but also my b6 requirement was listed as a 9 (out of 10). Yet every time I'd take b6...even tiny amounts, I'd get 'stocking and glove neurpathy'. This diminished and went away only after adding good ol' b2 to the mix. Apparently the FAD and FMN enzymes that come from b2 (that you know who talked about so much) are necessary for b6 utilization. Yet, on the test results, b2 was not listed as a necessary nutrient.
If you could find someone who specializes in analyzing the results, that would push it into the 'worth it' category.