• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms? (Fear et al., 2012)

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
I saw this and thought I'd post it as at least a few of us are interested in the idea that questionnaire results may not be fully representative of reality.

Results aren't that clear cut here, so not that exciting I suppose.

Free full text: http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-12-797.pdf


Does anonymity increase the reporting of mental health symptoms?

Nicola T Fear, Rachel Seddon, Norman Jones, Neil Greenberg and Simon Wessely

BMC Public Health 2012, 12:797 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-797

Published: 17 September 2012

Abstract (provisional)

Background
There is no doubt that the perceived stigma of having a mental disorder acts as a barrier to help seeking. It is possible that personnel may be reluctant to admit to symptoms suggestive of poor mental health when such data can be linked to them, even if their personal details are only used to help them access further care. This may be particularly relevant because individuals who have a mental health problem are more likely to experience barriers to care and hold stigmatizing beliefs. If that is the case, then mental health screening programmers may not be effective in detecting those most in need of care. We aimed to compare mental health symptom reporting when using an anonymous versus identifiable questionnaire among UK military personnel on deployment in Iraq.

Methods
Survey among UK military personnel using two questionnaires, one was anonymous (n = 315) and one collected contact details (i.e. identifiable, n = 296). Distribution was by alternate allocation. Data were collected in Iraq during January-February 2009.

Results
No significant difference in the reporting of symptoms of common mental disorders was found (18.1% of identifiable vs. 22.9% of anonymous participants). UK military personnel were more likely to report sub-threshold and probable PTSD when completing questionnaires anonymously (sub-threshold PTSD: 2.4% of identifiable vs. 5.8% of anonymous participants; probable PTSD: 1.7% of identifiable vs. 4.8% of anonymous participants). Of the 11 barriers to care and perceived social stigma statements considered, those completing the anonymous questionnaire compared to those completing the identifiable questionnaire were more likely to endorse three statements: "leaders discourage the use of mental health services" (9.3% vs. 4.6%), "it would be too embarrassing" (41.6% vs. 32.5%) and "I would be seen as weak" (46.6% vs. 34.2%).

Conclusions
We found a significant effect on the reporting of sub-threshold and probable PTSD and certain stigmatizing beliefs (but not common mental disorders) when using an anonymous compared to identifiable questionnaire, with the anonymous questionnaire resulting in a higher prevalence of PTSD and increased reporting of three stigmatizing beliefs. This has implications for the conduct of mental health screening and research in the US and UK military.
 

Esther12

Senior Member
Messages
13,774
Thanks. I read this a few days ago (not thoroughly though). I was a bit unsure of the implications of the results too. People are less likely to try to hide mental health problems than is thought? But it still could be a problem? I decided not to put much work in to it.
 

Dolphin

Senior Member
Messages
17,567
Thanks. I read this a few days ago (not thoroughly though). I was a bit unsure of the implications of the results too. People are less likely to try to hide mental health problems than is thought? But it still could be a problem?
That's what I picked up from the abstract anyway.