roxie60 said: ↑
Nanonug, sorry if I asked this already but I presume you were able to interpret the results from 23andme? Also did they include MTHFR in their gene test?
Greenshots replied:
Good luck with 23&me's "interpretation" of your test results, its a joke! They also don't include about 10-12 of the more important genes Yasko tests for like NOS, SHMT, ACE, ACAT, and more.
Everything you said in this paragraph is false and why I originally replied to you. I explained exactly why what you said was not accurate. I listed the SNP's that 23andme does not report on at the moment and explained that you can in fact search for the genes you say 23andme does not test for within the raw data browser. You were the one spreading false information here. Go to the raw data browser and search SHMT1, ACE, NOS1, NOS2, NOS3, ACAT1 and ACAT2 and let me know if you get SNP results.
You said you wasted your time searching for your results, so I tried to help you understand by linking my spreadsheet and offered you my assistance. That's why I asked if you had run your data through promethease. It just sounded like you were overwhelmed and didn't know where to start.Greenshots said:
In my opinion, going the other way means spending months or years of your time trying to decipher things even while alotta people behave as if they've got it all figured out somehow but then you really don't even know if you're treating yourself the right way. Everyone here, aside from maybe Dr. vank and maybe Freddd are just guessing and that may be okay for some with milder problems but if you're really sicker then its a big waste.
You reply back to me with quite a snippy attitude. Implying that if I didn't get Yasko tested, that I'd have to spend all of this time trying to figure out my Yasko SNP's and that I'm wasting time. Also essentially my ideas are not meaningful because I'm not Fredd, Rich or Yasko and I don't have a MD behind my name.
I have asked you at least twice now to give specific SNP's that are “obsolete and inaccurate” but you have yet to provide me with that data. If you are only questioning the BHMT's, then I have flat out asked you if your results from 23andme vs Yasko were different. You again avoided answering this question yet continue to say my spreadsheet is inaccurate and obsolete. Can you understand why this is frustrating? I'm trying to get to the bottom of your accusations of having “inaccurate and obsolete” SNP”s, but you aren't providing me any compelling evidence.
Greenshots said:
I don't know about you, but we're not all officially disabled and allowed to collect FundsI so some of us have to get on the ball rather than researching intersting topics for the next decade. I don't begrudge anyone their Disability payments either, I congratulate you!
You then try to insult me by being snarky and implying that I'm just sitting around collecting checks, so I have all the time in the world to waste being sick... Talk about being rude! You do not know anything about me!
You continuously have accused me of spreading false info, but my point is that you are doing this in regards to the info provided by 23andme. 23andme does in fact test for the GENEs on Yasko's test, but does not test for a few specific SNP's.There is a huge difference.
You have NOT provided me with any evidence that my spreadsheet is in fact wrong. You just continue to repeat that there are "obsolete and inaccurate" SNP's, but you haven't shown me a single set of data that backs up your claim.
Therefore if anyone on here has concerns about my spreadsheet, I want to know about them and I encourage you to email me or PM. BUT if you aren't going to work with me to determine the discrepancies or even provide evidence that there is a discrepancy, then I cannot take your concerns seriously.