We need an Australian version of: Nightingale
Welcome to Phoenix Rising!
Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.
To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.
As for starting our own org, sounds good. But I really don't think anyone here is in a state of health where they should take on that kind of responsibility. I don't mean to rain on your parade, I share the frustration. But we must also put our own health & well-being first.
Don't underestimate the power of an individual either.
I watched a seminar by Dr Lapp (I think) where he said all the top specialists had agreed to call the disease ME but they still needed the CFS as most of the research was under that banner. We can't just drop it unfortunately.
All that CFS research and calling it ME research when the patients used may not have been ME patients.. is flawed in itself.... its a whole heap of watered down research with possibly only a third to a six of the patients having ME.
ME needs its own research being done.
Hearing it said as you did.. makes it sound like Dr Lapp is just wanting a name change like they did in England with calling CFS ME. Is that what he is trying to do???
I agree. I personally don't think we are going to get anywhere without establishing subgroups either, I beleive that should have been addressed long ago.
Well, you make a difference here
The problem is most of the research has been done on cfs not ME, fuduka criteria etc are what have been used.
I think the big issue is.. the mixing of subgroups or different illnesses.. has played a big factor in maybe even why they cant find biomarkers of our illness. (there even could be different biomarkers for different phases of the illness?).
Grouping like symptom/sign groups together whether they are different illnesses or the same.. is more likely to lead to more abnormalities standing out and the only way to really get these groups split is be calling them different things hence forcing a split.
This should lead to more better studies no matter what group or subgroup you full under. I hate the situation, as right now I feel like there is no hope at all of a biomarkers being easily found due to very different ways of illness presentation.