Why does Fudka have to be revisited, why can't they just suck it up and grow....? They could just as easily say we need to strengthen the criteria we use to define this condition. And then call in the very experts they've contracted with and adopt the CCC or ICC or some agreed upon (by the real experts) variation based upon them . But instead the CDC is giving contracts to the experts. So since it's a contract will these experts be bound to conditions imposed on them by the CDC such as using the very same Fudka criteria they plan on using the data collected to revisit?