• Welcome to Phoenix Rising!

    Created in 2008, Phoenix Rising is the largest and oldest forum dedicated to furthering the understanding of, and finding treatments for, complex chronic illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia, long COVID, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and allied diseases.

    To become a member, simply click the Register button at the top right.

Susceptibility of human primary neuronal cells to XMRV (XMRV infecting the brain)

Jemal

Senior Member
Messages
1,031
This just popped up on the radar... full article is available as PDF. It's a NIH/FDA/HHS study.

Susceptibility of human primary neuronal cells to Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-related (XMRV) virus infection.
Veerasamy Ravichandran, Eugen O Major, Carol Ibe, Maria Chiara Monaco, Mohan Kumar Haleyur Girisetty and Indira K Hewlett

Virology Journal 2011, 8:443 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-443
Published: 20 September 2011

Background
Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-related (XMRV) virus is a recently identified mouse gammaretrovirus that has the ability to infect certain human cells. In this study, we investigated the susceptibility of primary neuronal cell types to infection with XMRV. Findings: We observed that the human primary progenitors, progenitor-derived neurons, and progenitor-derived astrocytes supported XMRV multiplication. Interestingly, both progenitors and progenitor-derived neurons were more susceptible compared with progenitor-derived astrocytes. In addition, XMRV-infected Jurkat cells were able to transmit infection to neuronal cells.

Conclusions
These data suggest that neuronal cells are susceptible for XMRV infection.

This study further substantiates our speculation that XMRV could infect brain cells. Further in-vitro and in-vivo studies are warranted to
identify and characterize the XMRV, and its role if any, in the brain cells.

http://www.virologyj.com/content/8/1/443/abstract
 

Boule de feu

Senior Member
Messages
1,118
Location
Ottawa, Canada
In only four hours, they were able to see that the bystander neuronal cell was infected. They had to prove that XMRV was able to cross the blood-brain barrier... But another team had already done this earlier this year.
This is fascinating stuff! It's like reading a science-fiction book.

What is also interesting is the fact that a very small amount of XMRV can infect the neuronal cells.
 

alex3619

Senior Member
Messages
13,810
Location
Logan, Queensland, Australia
Hi, the more I read about XMRV, the more I don't want it to be the cause. I would like the cause to be something simple so that when understood we can just pop a pill.

With this level of XMRV involvement then if XMRV needs to be treated and we adopt an infected cell killing strategy, then our brains will be mush - thats presuming we can even survive such a treatment. The best we might hope for in the medium term is to suppress the virus, not eradicate it, or suffer brain damage as a result.

So I both hope XMRV will be shown to be causal and also disproved. Only a few days till the announcements at the Ottawa conference now.

Bye
Alex

PS From a first glimpse of the PDF I can see this was tested on lab grown cells. These cells may have been undergoing changes that made them more vulnerable. It is also uncertain if this is linked to increased susceptibility in children and not adults. Could this indicate increased susceptibility for the unborn to XMRV? If so it could mean that children with XMRV have a much higher infiltration of the virus into the brain .. can anyone say "autism"?
 

kurt

Senior Member
Messages
1,186
Location
USA
Hi, the more I read about XMRV, the more I don't want it to be the cause. I would like the cause to be something simple so that when understood we can just pop a pill.

With this level of XMRV involvement then if XMRV needs to be treated and we adopt an infected cell killing strategy, then our brains will be mush - thats presuming we can even survive such a treatment. The best we might hope for in the medium term is to suppress the virus, not eradicate it, or suffer brain damage as a result.

So I both hope XMRV will be shown to be causal and also disproved. Only a few days till the announcements at the Ottawa conference now.

There are many very bad viruses and other pathogens out there that can also infect nerves. Showing that XMRV can proliferate in nerves says nothing about ME/CFS, particularly given all the negative studies.
 

RustyJ

Contaminated Cell Line 'RustyJ'
Messages
1,200
Location
Mackay, Aust
There are many very bad viruses and other pathogens out there that can also infect nerves. Showing that XMRV can proliferate in nerves says nothing about ME/CFS, particularly given all the negative studies.

The evidence is mounting. Not proof, but another piece of evidence.

The only study to look at the brains of primates, actually found evidence of XMRV in long-term chronic infection. The macaque study proved infectivity in non-human primates, with immune systems close to ours.

The macaque study showed that although the virus appeared to disappear from the blood, it was still in evidence in reservoir tissue areas. There are two parts to this assessment. XMRV almost disappears from the blood, so standard testing of plasma will not find it. Ergo, look in the tissue. Especially tissue where Abopec3 is not evident.

Certainly, given that no study has looked for XMRV in the human brain, then it certainly can't be ruled out. To say otherwise, given this evidence is very premature.

The negative studies do not use proven assays - they just prove they don't have the tools to find it. If you walk into a dark room with a candle, you still have to light it to see something. If XMRV is not in the blood, then you are not going to find it anyway (at least not with insensitive assays). Look in the tissue!!!

BTW, animal models on mice show MLVs are lethal, and it's not much use saying 'oh in humans, Abopec 3 stops XMRV' - that's simply not true.

There are many very bad viruses and other pathogens out there that can also infect nerves.

I think the evidence shows that ME/CFs is a serious neurological disease. And a retrovirus is a very serious virus.

The point made by Alex is a good one. If there is virus in the brain, and the neuro problems in ME/CFS prove to be more than inflammation caused by a rampant immune system, then getting medication past the brain-blood barrier to treat hold-out areas is going to be difficult.
 

Enid

Senior Member
Messages
3,309
Location
UK
Thanks Jemal - a great find - Virology is really going ahead now.
 

barbc56

Senior Member
Messages
3,657
PS From a first glimpse of the PDF I can see this was tested on lab grown cells. These cells may have been undergoing changes that made them more vulnerable. It is also uncertain if this is linked to increased susceptibility in children and not adults. Could this indicate increased susceptibility for the unborn to XMRV? If so it could mean that children with XMRV have a much higher infiltration of the virus into the brain .. can anyone say "autism"?

Add to what Kurt says above there has been no link between Autism and XMRV, even if it weren''t a contaminant.
 

ixchelkali

Senior Member
Messages
1,107
Location
Long Beach, CA
If the XMRV association with ME/CFS holds up, this would give us a mechanism for the "encephalo" part of myalgic encephalomyelitis. Interesting that the T-cells could infect nearby neuronal cells.

I don't suppose anyone who has the disease would be surprised to learn that brain cells were infected.
 

Jemal

Senior Member
Messages
1,031
I don't suppose anyone who has the disease would be surprised to learn that brain cells were infected.

Nope, not with all the headaches, dizzyness, brainfog and exploding head like symptoms I have been getting...
 

xrayspex

Senior Member
Messages
1,111
Location
u.s.a.
you guys said that it would be hard to get meds past the blood brain barrier

I was reading another forum (not on cfs) and a guy described getting hit with symptom that reminded me of m.e., suffered for 6 mo.s and then his doc gave him 3 shots of penicillin in the rear cus he had borderline syph blood test but had been with one partner 15 years who was negative for it,but they treated just in case and he got better. would that go past blood brain barrier? his problems cleared up after that.

I don't understand why some things like hepatitis take forever to treat and its a rough ride but is that normal syphilis could be dormant and show up and then go
so easily? and I dont always understand the overlap between antivirals and antibioitics with certain problems. cheney sort of used both.
 

Jemal

Senior Member
Messages
1,031
you guys said that it would be hard to get meds past the blood brain barrier

I was reading another forum (not on cfs) and a guy described getting hit with symptom that reminded me of m.e., suffered for 6 mo.s and then his doc gave him 3 shots of penicillin in the rear cus he had borderline syph blood test but had been with one partner 15 years who was negative for it,but they treated just in case and he got better. would that go past blood brain barrier? his problems cleared up after that.

I don't understand why some things like hepatitis take forever to treat and its a rough ride but is that normal syphilis could be dormant and show up and then go
so easily? and I dont always understand the overlap between antivirals and antibioitics with certain problems. cheney sort of used both.

Infections of the brain are very difficult to treat as the blood-brain-barrier will block most antibiotics and antibodies. Apparently some antibiotics can go through under certain conditions, probably with a delay...
 

Daffodil

Senior Member
Messages
5,875
well this is exactly what i have suspected since the 1st damn day i got CFS...that it was in my brain. i had trouble thinking from the very FIRST day. wow. so it CAN infect neurons. this is the WORSE case scenario for us!! my worse fear!! we will need AZT in amounts that we cannot take. other than that, we will have to wait for CMX157 to come out!