The safety of haart

Blog entry posted by Noreen Martin, Apr 2, 2010.

http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=johnathan_fishbein_1

The above link is about the former Dr. Jonathan Fishbein, who was the highest ranking whistleblower in America's history. He was fired from his duties as Director of the National Institutes of Health NIH... He exposed misconduct in the AIDS drug safety clinical trials for Nevirapine. He eventually won his case.
We are not always privy to detrimental information about these drugs. Many times it is discovered by investigative reporters under The Freedom of Information Act. Another interesting story is by Liam Scheff, who wrote about orphan children who were used to test an AIDS drug in New York City, many died from this.
The point in all of this is to be diligent and do some research on your own. Being informed cannot be a bad thing, it will surely give you more information in making the right choices.
  1. Carrigon
    Thanks for the links. I also think this is similar to what they do to cancer patients with chemotherapy. The chemo is more damaging than most of the cancers and destroys the quality of life and the immune system completely. The patients die. Whether or not they would have died without the chemo, they still die anyway, but they die a horrible wasted away death with the chemo.

    I'm not a big fan of traditional medicine and big pharma. I think they most often do far more harm than good. About the only time they are any good is for simple things that are fairly easy to fix or treat. Like if you just break a bone. Anything else, and they become very scary.
  2. Noreen Martin
    Carrigon,
    You might be interested in Kim who is sueing about these HIV tests:
    http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/04/27/aids_test_unscientific_test_kit_makers_sued_in_kansas.htm

    http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/01/13/aids_no_gold_standard_for_hiv_testing.htm
    There isn't any gold standard for these tests and over 70 things can cause a false positive.
  3. Noreen Martin
    Yes, I would agree that most people are better off not being HIV+, because usually at some point, they will be pressured to take the drugs. Worse than that, many people that I know have to take the drugs while they are pregnant or risk losing their children. One person left town to have her baby due to this. Womens bodies change producing many chemicals during pregnancy and quite often they come up HIV+. In fact, the recommendation is to test pregnant women twice during pregnancy. Yes, most HIV+ persons do not have any symptoms at all. There are in fact, very few "true" cases of AIDS. Yes, the drugs can kill one and it is always blamed on the virus. I only point this out because I am in contact with many HIV+ and know their stories. I am not trying to discourage anyone, who wishes to take them, I only hope that they look seriously into the matter, as they could be trading one set of problems for something worse.

    The following is another article with more graphic pictures:
    http://liamscheff.com/daily/2009/01/27/new-york-times-children-die-in-aids-drug-trials-but-the-drugs-are-fine-fine-fine/
  4. Carrigon
    What's really interesting is, that first article talks about how the HIV test is not reliable. Well, if it's not reliable, then that would go back to how so many CFIDS patients present as HIV Negative AIDS. And it also explains why there are alot of HIV positive people out there who are not sick and are a hundred times better than CFIDS patients. We might really all just be a subset of AIDS that continually test negative for it. It's almost a blessing in disguise because they would have pumped us full of those same toxic drugs and we would no doubt be dead or full of cancers and all the other problems from those drugs.

    The thought of them doing that to those kids, it's so horrible and they got away with it.
  5. Noreen Martin
    Here is the story about the orphan children and AIDS testing.
    http://www.altheal.org/toxicity/house.htm

    Also, some more useful info.
    http://www.altheal.org/toxicity/toxicity.htm

    http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1P2-881035.html